|
|
Talent management is becoming an increasingly critical component to ensuring sustainability and competitive advantage. Unfortunately, the leadership in many organizations still views human resource functions as a cost center instead of a strategy driver. A theory put forth in an article published by Booz Allen Hamilton[1] to raise the view of talent as a strategic asset is to identify “business-critical” job functions or roles, categorized by the “value impact” on an organization.
As distinguished by
the author, organizational roles differ in value impact and cost impact to
the organization. From the
author’s perspective the ability to classify job roles by value allows
an organization to employ different talent-management approaches for
attraction and retention. The
author continues with the thought that basic management processes such as
sourcing, development and training, compensation, retention, and
separation are conceptually the same for all job roles.
However, the tools used in applying the processes will differ.
The difference in the tools used will be evident in compensation
practices, training procedures, and recruiting methods. We agree with the
article’s premise that talent management is not being leveraged by
senior organizational leaders and also concur with job classification by
value impact on the organization. As
the author notes, it enables the organization to implement the appropriate
talent-management strategy and tactics. Our contribution to
this theory extends the methodology of developing various talent
management strategies based on the value-impact of the job role.
We believe that this difference should incorporate lead indicators
as a metric used in the recruitment process for high-value roles.
Lead indicators can be drawn from non-traditional behavioral
interviews, job simulations, and pre-employment testing.
As an example we will
examine the recruiting of a sales professional and the importance of
measuring lead indicators as a source of competitive advantage.
According to the
above theory, sales professionals would fit into an Ambassador role,
meaning that they provide a high degree of organizational value, thus a
point of competitive differentiation in the marketplace.
Studies indicate that 80 percent[2]
of all sales people fail to complete their first year because of sale
prospecting distress stemming from Sales Call Reluctance®.
Measuring an applicant’s Sales Call Reluctance®, as a lead
indicator of performance in a sales role, provides another layer of
assurance in the candidate and helps define and establish what training
and education curriculum are needed to get the most out of a new hire. Click here for
more detail on Call Reluctance Types Most organizations
are driven by goals that depend on sustainable and consistent growth,
which cannot be obtained without a talented and effective sales force.
Applying leading-edge measures to the recruiting practice heightens
the awareness of talent management as a strategic driver and enables a
more in-depth look into the competencies of your sales force. A human resources department that
uses tools such as leading metrics begins to transcend from a purely
transactional department to an area of strategic importance to the
organization. It is these
types of human resources departments that are looked upon to not only hire
new people but to plan and model workforce and recruiting initiatives that
support the overall goals of the organization.
A company can become highly competitive because it is not only
hiring people to fill job vacancies, but it can develop forward-looking
training based on the at-hire knowledge it obtained using the leading
indicators. For more Jamie Bongiorno [1] Jones, Jeffrey. Tureq, Dominique. Strategy + Business. “Rethinking the Value of Talent”. April 27, 2006 [2] Behavioral Science Research Press, Inc. Dallas Texas 2003
These materials have been prepared for educational and information purposes only. They are not consulting advice or opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a consultant-client relationship between The Hill Group, Inc. and any recipient of this material. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional advice.
| |||||