|
|
Organizations
describe competitive advantage in different terms, depending on current
environmental factors. For the
foreseeable future competitive advantage will be defined by an
organization’s ability to properly manage their human capital processes,
including recruitment and retention of top talent.
The federal government projects a 21 percent job-vacancy rate by
2010, driven by baby-boom retirements and declining birthrates.[1]
This demographic fact strikes a cord with employers that they must
quantify the factors influencing their internal environment to leverage
their talent as a competitive advantage.
Human
Capital as Competitive Advantage Research indicates
that an organization’s shareholder value is directly influenced by the
quality of its human capital practices.[2]
The research shows that the better a company does in managing these
practices, the better return the shareholders will realize. This
research also concludes that superior human capital practices are lead
indicators of strong financial returns, providing additional support to
the notion that human capital is a critical factor in growth and
competitive success. Employee satisfaction
is a key measure in determining the success of an organization’s human
capital practices. Research
indicates a high correlation between employee satisfaction and customer
satisfaction.[3]
Thus, a company with a high level of employee satisfaction and
retention is more likely to excel in customer satisfaction, which
translates into higher profits. The
causal link is then made between employee satisfaction, a company’s
human capital practices, customer satisfaction, and ultimately increased
profit. Authors of “Putting
the Service-Profit Chain to Work”[4]
use the model in Figure 1 to describe the relationship between employee
satisfaction and organizational profit.
The figure states that an employee-centric organization will retain
customer loyalty, which translates into increased profit. Figure
1: The Service –Profit Chain
Figure
2: The Service- Profit Chain with recruiting outcomes
Our premise is that an
employee-centric organization spawns two outcomes which ultimately drive
the success of the organization. One
outcome is employee satisfaction, which has been shown to impact
profitability by the previously mentioned research.
The second is the successful recruiting efforts that feed off of
the employee satisfaction and in turn, bring into the organization
individuals with a stronger sense of commitment and loyalty.
This increased quality and loyalty originates from a higher percent
of employee referrals and organizational branding that comes from
achieving a sought-after work environment.
Holistic
Measurement The argument of
recruiting, retaining and overall employee satisfaction being an indicator
of profitability is predicated on the measurement of these internal
factors. The concept of
“employee satisfaction” embodies many influential factors, which can
never be improved upon if not measured quantitatively.
These factors include: Communication The above list of factors is just that – a list of factors – if not
measured in a manner that provides a complete snapshot of the
organization’s work environment. The
recommended methodology is a holistic process that encompasses all of the
influencing factors in a series of surveys that gathers the data from
different perspectives. The combination of four
surveys — New Hire, Employee Opinion, 360-Degree Feedback, and Exit —
administered over time, can provide an organization with a dynamic view of
their workplace environment. This
information enables the effective management of the systems and components
that influence employee satisfaction. Below
are some key points regarding each survey: ·
New
Hire: New
hires provide a unique perspective of your organization and should be
tapped for their views on issues such as: what attracted them to your
organization, is the position what they expected, and were the orientation
and training effective? This
survey will enable an organization to assess what a new hire values and
their perception on how the organization is performing in key areas of the
workplace or in components of the employment proposition.
A new employee is surveyed at the time they are hired and at their
three-month, six-month, and one-year anniversaries so adjustments can be
made quickly and progress can be tracked. ·
Employee
Opinion: Employee
opinion surveys enable management to understand strengths, weaknesses, and
opportunities for improvement in the work environment.
Employers can gauge and track levels of employee satisfaction and
commitment that ultimately have an impact on internal service quality,
external service quality, and ultimately profitability or success.
Understanding of workplace issues and their impact on work units
can provide management with the ability to allocate scarce resources
strategically to have the greatest impact and return. ·
360-Degree
Feedback: This method assesses
individual strengths and weaknesses by asking supervisors, peers, and
subordinates to rate the performance of an individual. The results of the
360-degree survey can help direct professional development opportunities. ·
Exit:
Individuals who separate their
employment from an organization have a wealth of information (and are
usually willing to share it!) regarding their position, the organization,
and their motivations for leaving. Organizations
can use this information to measure trends over time between departments,
supervisors, position types, and time periods. The next decade will prove challenging to all organizations as we head into an unprecedented demographic event. The prepared organization will understand, through measurement, its current internal state and initiate steps to maintain or enhance its competitive advantage. As the impending labor shortage escalates, it will be an organization’s ability to recruit and retain the top talent that will greatly influence its success. [1] Bureau of Labor Statistics: 2000 to 2010 Employment Projections; Table 4. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.toc.htm [2] Whatson Wyatt Human Capital Index: Human Capital as a Lead Indicator of Shareholder Value. Retrieved on 2/14/06 from www. watsonwyatt.com/research/featured/hci.asp [3]“Employee and Customer Attachment: Synergies for Competitive Advantage” Human Resource Planning 14, No 2 (1991) 89-102 [4] Heskett, Jones, Loveman, Sasser Jr.,Schleisinger “Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work” Harvard Business Review. March 1, 1994 These materials have been prepared for educational and information purposes only. They are not consulting advice or opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a consultant-client relationship between The Hill Group, Inc. and any recipient of this material. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional advice.
| |||||