|
|
By Matt Stanczak, Consultant Operations
research (OR) initiatives are normally associated with increasing
efficiency, decreasing costs, and streamlining operations. OR
modelers are normally concerned with optimizing production functions or
supply chains to save money for the corporation. But using
quantitative methods to optimize softer business goals is rarely a goal
for these mathematical modelers. However, as our economy becomes
more service oriented, goals like customer service and customer
satisfaction have become important business drivers. These types of
business goals are not as tangible or easily measured as traditional
business drivers like cost, efficiency, revenue, etc. In an
innovative and ambitious optimization modeling project, a freight rail
company in Canada decided to make customer service the optimization goal. The
freight rail transportation industry is rarely associated with words like
“innovative.” At least not for the past century. For over
100 years, freight rail transportation networks have been operated on a
tonnage-based model. Trains ran when they reached the minimum
tonnage required to be profitable. While this method seems to have
worked well enough for generations, 21st Century customers are
increasingly demanding more individualized services or finding other
options for transporting goods. Recognizing
the change in business climate, Robert Ritchie, President and CEO of
Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR), envisioned a new transportation model
where customer service drives the operation of the freight train network.
This revolutionary approach required not only a change in business
philosophy, but also a massive overhaul of the operations system used to
guide the freight network. Ritchie
decided to leverage operations research techniques to model his new
vision. Trying to quantify and optimize “customer service” would
have been difficult to achieve. But the business deliverables that
affect customer satisfaction, like flexible scheduling, could be
optimized. CPR contracted with MultiModal Applied Systems to tackle
the enormous process modeling and re-engineering project. By
using a schedule-based business model, CPR found that not only were
customer satisfaction goals being met, but operational goals were also
improving. By making departure schedules more regular, CPR could
more efficiently assign crew shifts and allocate equipment. Labor
productivity increased as a result. The data collected for making
scheduling more efficient was also applied to making the transportation
system more efficient. Travel times on standard routes decreased
significantly, fuel consumption decreased and locomotives were utilized
more productively. As
a result of this massive enterprise-wide modeling initiative, CPR
decreased its cost base by 300 million Canadian dollars. Profits
increased by 19 percent. CPR’s operations are now considered the
best practice in railway freight delivery. There
are many lessons to take away from this case study. The most obvious
is that applying operations research techniques to transportation networks
can yield enormous results in operational efficiency. An equally
important lesson is that business drivers that are usually considered
“soft” drivers contribute heavily to a businesses bottom line.
And these intangible business drivers like customer service can be
creatively modeled and optimized effectively. When analyzing your
business processes, don’t forget how important these intangible drivers
are to business effectiveness and don’t be afraid to try innovative
techniques for quantifying intangible business processes. Matt Stanczak specializes in decision analysis, business modeling, and operations research at The Hill Group, Inc. He can be reached at 412.343.9393 or via email at mstanczak@hillgroupinc.com.
The Canadian Pacific Railway case study used for this
article was referenced from the article below: Horner, Peter. “On the Right Track.” OR/MS Today June 2003: pp. 29 – 33. These materials have been prepared for educational and information purposes only. They are not consulting advice or opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a consultant-client relationship between The Hill Group, Inc. and any recipient of this material. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional advice.
|